Isobel is a Conservative local councillor on Reading Borough Council, first elected in 2006. She represents Mapledurham Ward. This is her personal blog with news & her views. Do visit her Facebook page for more regular posts: Cllr Isobel Ballsdon.
If you would like to contact Isobel, emails may be sent to Isobel.Ballsdon@reading.gov.uk and will be treated in confidence
Today Reading Borough Council (RBC) has opened its online consultation survey for The Heights. Residents need
to choose from five possible sites giving their preference of permanent site
for The Heights primary school.
There are a series of questions which will enable people to state
the reason for their choice as well as what one thing would make them change their
The sites put forward by the Stakeholder Groups, agreed by
the Education Funding Agency (EFA), are:
High Ridge, Upper Warren Avenue
Mapledurham Playing Fields (MPF)
Albert Road Recreation Ground (ARP)
Shipnells Farm (better known as Bugs Bottom [BB])
Dysons Farm (Land at the junction of Shepherd’s Lane and
The survey runs from today (30 March) until 5 pm on Friday 1st
May. When complete, RBC will pass on the
responses to the EFA. The EFA will then
take into account all geographical data when making a final decision on the
permanent location for The Heights.
Hard copies of the survey will be available at the Civic
Centre in Bridge Street, local libraries and leisure centres.
The EFA’s Information Pack which, as indicated by its name,
provides information about the permanent site options to help aid people making
an informed choice.
Please note that information on Stakeholder Group’s own
websites/Facebook pages or literature may not be accurate.
For example Bugs Bottom is actually 32.47 acres (including some houses
in the north east corner) – not 40 acres as described by one group.
One last thing: Due to popular demand and for transparency I have asked RBC to publish on its website the Trust/ownership details relating to the three sites it has responsibility for, ie MPF, ARP & BB. If successful I will update readers accordingly.
Unfortunately RBC has not agreed to publish the Trust/ownership details relating to the three sites in the council's website
Two Updates at bottom of post
Residents angered that they’ve
not received Reading Borough Council’s (RBC) letter yet should get it through
their door by the end of today.
The letter, in which RBC announces
tonight’s public meeting (which starts at 7 pm at Rivermead Leisure Centre) and
sets out details of the consultation process to identify a permanent site for
The Heights primary school, should all have been delivered by Monday (23 March). However several roads were left out.
I raised my concern of
non-delivery a week ago with RBC officers after a resident alerted me to the
problem. I chased for an answer on
Monday and, having still not had a response, spoke directly with RBC’s Managing
RBC hired a local company to
distribute the letter across the Borough as well as the parishes of Mapledurham
and Kidmore End. After mine and other complaints,
RBC asked the delivery company to review its GPS tracking to see which homes
had actually received the letter and to identify those homes missed *.
Kevin McDaniel (RBC's officer in charge of the consultation) told me that the contracted company should complete delivery of the roads omitted, as well as those roads
part-done, by the end of today (Wednesday).
The late delivery has made
tempers soar in this highly charged debate over where The Heights’ permanent
home should go. One local resident has written to me “I can think of no other possible reason
for this omission than a deliberate attempt to exclude the people who are
most likely to try and protect Mapledurham Playing Fields as the trustees
should be doing. This matter has been known about for well over a week and
to be 'looking into the matter' today seems to me an absolute fob. I am by
no means assured about anything coming from RBC. This 'consultation' will
be a farce.”
Tonight’s meeting is being
recorded so anyone unable to attend should be able to watch it (RBC has indicated that the recording will be published on RBC's website in the next few days).
* Please note that homes with a
notice “No unsolicited mail” will not receive RBC’s letter to meet with the
registered delivery company’s policy.
Also note that parking charges may be suspended at Rivermead tonight, however please check to ensure this is the case! Update: Following Wednesday night's public meeting lots of people have told me that their road still hasn't received RBC's letter. I've reported the roads through to RBC and this is the latest response: To: "Ballsdon, Isobel" Sent: Thursday, 26 March 2015, 16:56 Subject: Roads still without RBC's consultation letter From: "McDaniel, Kevin" Hello Isobel, Thank you for sending these through. We have asked the supplier to review every single GPS trace to ensure that every street has been covered and to make good any omissions which are not covered by “no circular” instructions or physical impediments (eg locked gates). They will advise us once that process is complete and I will let you know too. I trust this will give everyone a letter and that all will take part in the survey. Regards Kevin Further Update Today (31 March) I an RBC officer said that a further conversation was going to take place tomorrow (Wednesday) morning with the distribution company to find out whether the delivery is yet complete.
Reading Borough Council's (RBC's) letter should be arriving on your doorstep this week, giving details of the consultation arrangements to help identify a permanent location for The Heights Primary School.
Please download a copy [see to the right] if you have not received one, though do let me know so that I can inform RBC to ensure that your road is included in the letter drop. Bear in mind the letter is not in an envelope, nor is it personally addressed, it is simply one piece of A4 paper.
For further information please look at my earlier post on 10 March where I wrote more background information on this whole subject.
As yet the Education Funding Agency (EFA) has not published its Information Pack. I believe this has been delayed by the late addition of the fifth site to the consultation.
Update: Following complaints from residents of non-delivery of RBC's letter I raised their concerns with RBC. As soon as I receive a response I will put a further update. So far I've had complaints from individuals that Upper Warren Avenue, Gravel Hill and Hewett Close have either not received it the entire length, or some homes have been missed out.
Traffic Management Committee last night my Conservative colleague Cllr Ed
Hopper raised concerns about Reading Borough Council's (RBC’s) recent announcement
that Reading Bridge will close completely for two weeks during GCSE and A Level
exams, shortly after the General & Local Elections.
calls from Rob Wilson MP highlighting the risks of significant impact upon
students had been derided by RBC's deputy leader Cllr Tony Page and last night
was no different. Responsible parents
have a valid concern and it is disgraceful that Cllr Page should dismiss out of
hand these parents’ plea to rethink the closure dates.
told the committee it simply isn’t possible to close Reading Bridge without
having a huge impact on traffic across Reading, pointing out that a closure
should not be considered in the run up to Christmas, over the Reading Festival
period, or during the public examination season. Ed supported Rob Wilson MP’s call for the closure
works to be re-scheduled, stating that Cllr Page shouldn’t play roulette with
young people’s future.
parent who has teenagers (like me) knows, biologically they find it difficult
to get up in the morning. They need a
lot of sleep. Add to this the uncertainty of how long their journey
to school will take and it is easy to understand parents’ concerns. The home to school distance at secondary
level far exceeds the usual 2 miles to a primary school. One teenager from my road travels 5 miles
across town to Maiden Erlegh so would face a 1¾ hour walk, according to Google
Maps, to sit her A levels. The ReadyBike
scheme isn’t comprehensive enough to enable exam entrants to jump on a bike
during the bridge closure, even if all of the teenagers were road safe.
seems that Reading's Labour administration, in its haste to avoid closing the
bridge in the run up to the General Election, has failed to take into account
the serious consequences students may have to endure. It is ironic therefore that Cllr Page attacked
Rob Wilson MP for “electioneering”.
students arrive late, they will not be allowed to sit their exam. I’d have thought my opposite number Labour’s
Education man, Cllr John Ennis, would be concerned by teenagers’ results being
impacted, but I haven’t seen any statement.
The exam results will have a bearing on the rest of these teenagers’
lives so it seems foolhardy for the Labour administration to plough ahead
regardless with the total closure of Reading Bridge. [Reading Bridge is scheduled to be closed from 18 May for two weeks.]
Vivienne Anderson on my right and other Shepherd's Lane residents
Local resident Vivienne Anderson presented a petition to Reading Borough Council's (RBC's) Traffic Management Sub-Committee tonight on behalf of Shepherds Lane residents calling for the introduction of road calming measures. She put forward strong arguments to support this request. Mrs Anderson's petition, which was signed by all bar three of the 50+ Shepherd's Lane residents, stated:
"For a long time residents have been aware of the hazardous and speeding traffic along Shepherds Lane which is causing great concern for the welfare of both the residents and animals. We, the undersigned, are signing this petition in order for the Council to effect changes and to prevent any further danger." Some Shepherd's Lane residents and I accompanied Mrs Anderson to demonstrate our support for action to be taken to stop the regular speeding which has lead to many cats being run over and killed, as well as several narrowly avoided vehicle collisions in what should be a 30 mile-an-hour road. Mrs Anderson said two of her cats had been killed in the last three years and that other residents had suffered the sadness of their cats being killed as well. She remarked that the volume of traffic had got a lot worse in the last few years. Mrs Anderson highlighted the danger of the junction with Kidmore Road and Tokers Green Lane where drivers have to jut out a long way before seeing whether it is clear up the lane. Tokers Green Lane, she said, is very busy with lots of mothers taking & picking up their children to Kidmore End School. Cars travelling north up Kidmore Road accelerate into Shepherd's Lane up the incline. This bend was widened and resurfaced by RBC which unfortunately has exacerbated the speeding problem. Mrs Anderson also commented about the large number of homes being built in Oxfordshire and that many motorists coming into Reading on the A4074 turn off, using Shepherd's Lane as a rat run to avoid the frequently congested St Peter's Hill. My Conservative colleague Cllr Ed Hopper (whose own ward ends at the northern end of the Kidmore Road) supported the petition stating that Thames Valley Police has conducted speed checks and confirmed that speeding motorists have been clocked, so the perception of local residents was correct. I am happy to report that the Committee agreed with the officer recommendation for the issue to be investigated and a report come back to a future meeting. The whole report can be read here. I will provide an update following the next step in this campaign.
Reading Borough Council (RBC) has opened a public consultation to
identify a permanent site out of a choice of five possible locations north of
the river for The Heights Primary School.
The Education Funding Agency is funding the consultation.
If you have a view on where The Heights’ permanent home should be, do
participate in the consultation. RBC is
writing a letter with details of the consultation’s format to about 67,000
households in Reading and the parishes of both Mapledurham and Kidmore End.
The EFA will be publishing an Information Pack next week (16 March or
thereabouts) which will have particulars on each of the five possible sites. This will be available electronically from
RBC’s website with hard
copies available at the Civic Centre, local libraries and leisure centres.
Thereafter a public meeting will take place on Wednesday 25 March
starting at 7 pm (doors open at 6.30 pm) at Rivermead. If you wish to attend, RBC asks that people
register in advance on the council’s same website page. The meeting will be independently chaired,
but the panel line-up is yet to be announced. If you would like to ask a question, submit this when you register to attend.
A survey will go live on RBC’s website page at 9.30 am on 30 March with hard copies available.
To recap, The Heights opened in September, much to the relief of local
families who otherwise would not have been offered a Reception class school
place north of the river as there was a shortage of places, on a temporary site
in lower Caversham. The school has a fantastic Head, Karen Edwards, who together with her staff, governors and trustees has established a nurturing and exciting learning environment in which pupils are thriving.
The EFA bought Highridge, a residential site in Upper Warren Avenue
(UWA), last June having first looked at all possible sites for the school’s
permanent home within the catchment area.
However due to the public’s negative reaction to the UWA site and
following requests by Rob Wilson MP, the EFA decided to concede to the local
Member of Parliament’s request to consult the public to try and find a locally
supported permanent home for The Heights.
The Heights temporary site off the Gosbrook Road is not large enough to
be the school’s permanent site, even if it were located within the school’s
The possible five sites (as listed by RBC) are:
High Ridge, Upper
Mapledurham Playing Fields
Albert Road Recreation Ground
Shipnells Farm (better known as Bugs Bottom)
Dysons Farm (Land at the junction of Shepherd’s Lane and Kidmore Road)