On Thursday 7th October Reading Borough Council's Labour administration is proposing what should happen to the Arthur Clark/Albert Road Day Centre joint site. I sit on the relevant Committee and will be representing the views of my ward residents.
If you have an opinion please let me know your thoughts before Thursday. You can read the report here and the appendix.
Essentially Labour wants agreement to sell off the site for new Extra Care Housing. They are proposing that the land is surplus to requirements and the Feasibility Study they have commissioned sets out the demolition of the current buildings, replacing them with a new building comprising 40 extra care flats which would be for rent, with associated ancillary facilities.
As I also sit on the Planning Applications Committee (PAC) of course I keep an open mind to proposals until any future planning application comes before PAC.
My question to readers is should this site's future be kept open to other possibilities at this stage? Residents I have spoken with already are keen that Residential and Respite care, as well as Day care facilities are considered seriously. What do you think? You can contact me on 07717 292003, send me your views to my email address: mail@isobelballsdon.com or write a message on this post.
Thank you to those who have shared your views with me already. This is an important site, particularly for residents living north of the river and I hope the administration will listen and act upon the public's wishes.
Isobel is a Conserative councillor on Reading Borough Council representing the newly created Caversham Heights Ward. Do get in touch if you'd like her help with a council-related issue via email: Isobel.Ballsdon@reading.gov.uk
Tuesday, 5 November 2013
Monday, 14 October 2013
The Heights Family Fun & Information Day
Do come along to St Andrew's Hall, Albert Road, Caversham Heights, this Sunday between 2 and 4 pm to have fun and learn more about The Heights new primary school. The parent group behind The Heights will be there, me included.
In September 2014 The Heights will be opening its doors for its first intake of pupils, serving the west of Caversham (predominantly Caversham Heights). This is the area where historically there was little realistic chance of a school place in whichever local catchment primary school. This forced families into their cars to primaries further afield, dispersing children to a variety of other primaries, breaking up local friendship groups formed amongst neighbours, toddler groups and in preschool settings.
The 20th October offers families the chance to learn more about The Heights whilst there'll be fun activities for children. Highlights include:
In September 2014 The Heights will be opening its doors for its first intake of pupils, serving the west of Caversham (predominantly Caversham Heights). This is the area where historically there was little realistic chance of a school place in whichever local catchment primary school. This forced families into their cars to primaries further afield, dispersing children to a variety of other primaries, breaking up local friendship groups formed amongst neighbours, toddler groups and in preschool settings.
The 20th October offers families the chance to learn more about The Heights whilst there'll be fun activities for children. Highlights include:
- Advice on how to make a primary school admission application
- Sight of the school uniform
- Copies of the prospectus
- Launch of the new website
- Bird of prey display
- Interactive story-time by the Enchanted Players
- Face painting
- Crafts corner with the chance to create artwork to be displayed in the new school
I will post a link to The Heights' new website upon its launch. To read my previous posts about the school, see the Education Label, near the top right hand side of my Homepage.
Labels:
Education,
Mapledurham Ward,
Thames Ward
Wednesday, 25 September 2013
Nationwide Meetings for Members
- UPDATE - meetings cancelled. Campaign a Success!
Rob Wilson MP has set up two meetings for Nationwide members to discuss the Building Society's recent announcement that the Caversham branch is to be closed.
The meetings are to give members an update and hopefully the opportunity to question a Nationwide representative (although they haven't yet confirmed acceptance of their invitation).
The meetings are:
7 pm on Monday 30 September in St Barnabas Church Hall, St Barnabas Road, Emmer Green; and
4 pm on Tuesday 1 October in Caversham Baptist Church, Caversham. For further information see Rob's website
Unfortunately I am unable to come to either meeting as I will be in Manchester, but I hope that as many of my Mapledurham Ward residents who are Nationwide members will be able to attend one of the meetings.
Chris Walton, Chairman of the Caversham Traders' Association, has set up a petition which you can sign here
Rob Wilson MP has set up two meetings for Nationwide members to discuss the Building Society's recent announcement that the Caversham branch is to be closed.
The meetings are to give members an update and hopefully the opportunity to question a Nationwide representative (although they haven't yet confirmed acceptance of their invitation).
The meetings are:
7 pm on Monday 30 September in St Barnabas Church Hall, St Barnabas Road, Emmer Green; and
4 pm on Tuesday 1 October in Caversham Baptist Church, Caversham. For further information see Rob's website
Unfortunately I am unable to come to either meeting as I will be in Manchester, but I hope that as many of my Mapledurham Ward residents who are Nationwide members will be able to attend one of the meetings.
Chris Walton, Chairman of the Caversham Traders' Association, has set up a petition which you can sign here
Monday, 9 September 2013
An Important Day for the Future of Education in Reading
Two events happen today which will have an important bearing on secondary school provision for Reading:
This morning sees the start of the Planning Inquiry into Reading Borough Council's refusal of planning permission to Taylor Wimpey of 193 homes on the old Elvian School site. The WREN group - West Reading Education Network fervently believe the site should be retained for school use and aspire to build a new secondary free school on it.
Earlier this year WREN was given government approval for their secondary school bid, but securing their preferred site is going to be decided this week by the Planning Inspector at the Inquiry which is taking place in Reading's Town Hall. If you support WREN's aims, do show your support by attending however much you can of the Inquiry. It is going to be in the Waterhouse Chamber. Today's hearing will be 11 am - 1 pm, 2 pm - 5 pm.
The Reading West MP, Alok Sharma, will be speaking at the Inquiry in support of WREN.
For further information go to WREN's website
As mentioned last week, in East Reading, Maiden Erlegh School is holding an information evening to give parents interested in their proposed new secondary school - to be situated in the heart of East Reading - an opportunity to ask head teacher Dr Peter Thomas and his team questions. Do go along between 6 and 8.30 pm to Maiden Erlegh, Silverdale Road, Earley, Reading, RG6 7HS tonight.
The Reading East MP, Rob Wilson, had approached Maiden Erlegh with the idea of them setting up a new school having listened to his constituents' wish to be able to benefit from the school's excellent education.
For further information, including the opportunity to register your interest, visit website
Today also sees the opening of the University Technical College, UTC, in Crescent Road, East Reading. More on this later.
This morning sees the start of the Planning Inquiry into Reading Borough Council's refusal of planning permission to Taylor Wimpey of 193 homes on the old Elvian School site. The WREN group - West Reading Education Network fervently believe the site should be retained for school use and aspire to build a new secondary free school on it.
Earlier this year WREN was given government approval for their secondary school bid, but securing their preferred site is going to be decided this week by the Planning Inspector at the Inquiry which is taking place in Reading's Town Hall. If you support WREN's aims, do show your support by attending however much you can of the Inquiry. It is going to be in the Waterhouse Chamber. Today's hearing will be 11 am - 1 pm, 2 pm - 5 pm.
The Reading West MP, Alok Sharma, will be speaking at the Inquiry in support of WREN.
For further information go to WREN's website
As mentioned last week, in East Reading, Maiden Erlegh School is holding an information evening to give parents interested in their proposed new secondary school - to be situated in the heart of East Reading - an opportunity to ask head teacher Dr Peter Thomas and his team questions. Do go along between 6 and 8.30 pm to Maiden Erlegh, Silverdale Road, Earley, Reading, RG6 7HS tonight.
The Reading East MP, Rob Wilson, had approached Maiden Erlegh with the idea of them setting up a new school having listened to his constituents' wish to be able to benefit from the school's excellent education.
For further information, including the opportunity to register your interest, visit website
Today also sees the opening of the University Technical College, UTC, in Crescent Road, East Reading. More on this later.
Saturday, 7 September 2013
Tuesday, 3 September 2013
Maiden Erlegh School announces bid to create new Secondary
Today Maiden Erlegh School announced their bid to create a new secondary satellite school for 11 - 16 year olds located somewhere in East Reading.
Information will be posted on ME's website tomorrow (4 September), and on Monday 9 September interested parents are invited to visit an Information Evening between 6 and 8.30 pm at the school.
Peter Thomas, Maiden Erlegh's head teacher will be executive headteacher of the proposed Free School and he aims to replicate all that is good about Maiden Erlegh.
Parental support is needed to prove to the DfE that there is the local support, so if your child or children are starting Year 4, 5 or 6 this week, do visit Maiden Erlegh's website to register your support for the bid. Similarly if you know anyone who might be interested, do let them know.
This is extremely welcome news. A substantial shortfall of secondary school places is forecast in Reading. Added to this, parents in East Reading are not all able to get places for their children in the highly successful Maiden Erlegh School so this bid to create a linked school provides an exciting opportunity for more families to benefit from the school's much admired ethos and education.
The Reading Chronicle has this report
Rob Wilson MP said “Maiden Erlegh is an outstanding school which has demonstrated yet again with its results this year that it provides a first class education to local children. I approached the school to work with me on a Free School bid so that this excellence could be available to even more local children because it is what many local parents tell me they want.
Information will be posted on ME's website tomorrow (4 September), and on Monday 9 September interested parents are invited to visit an Information Evening between 6 and 8.30 pm at the school.
Peter Thomas, Maiden Erlegh's head teacher will be executive headteacher of the proposed Free School and he aims to replicate all that is good about Maiden Erlegh.
Parental support is needed to prove to the DfE that there is the local support, so if your child or children are starting Year 4, 5 or 6 this week, do visit Maiden Erlegh's website to register your support for the bid. Similarly if you know anyone who might be interested, do let them know.
This is extremely welcome news. A substantial shortfall of secondary school places is forecast in Reading. Added to this, parents in East Reading are not all able to get places for their children in the highly successful Maiden Erlegh School so this bid to create a linked school provides an exciting opportunity for more families to benefit from the school's much admired ethos and education.
The Reading Chronicle has this report
Rob Wilson MP said “Maiden Erlegh is an outstanding school which has demonstrated yet again with its results this year that it provides a first class education to local children. I approached the school to work with me on a Free School bid so that this excellence could be available to even more local children because it is what many local parents tell me they want.
We already know that there is going to be pressure on
secondary school places, but I also think it is very important that local
parents do have a choice of good schools to send their children too. I hope
parents will get behind this bid, where there is clearly a proven track record
of providing a high quality education.”
Tuesday, 27 August 2013
Aftermath of Reading Festival: Camping Equipment Sale
With this year's Reading Festival over and the clear up in progress, do make the most of the sale this Sunday at Mapledurham Pavilion of the nearly new camping equipment sale between 10 am and 4 pm.
It is staggering what festival goers leave behind: once used tents, sleeping bags, wellies and other camping paraphernalia.
Thanks to volunteers who are helping clear the site and sort through the equipment you can benefit by getting excellent quality goods at knock-down prices.
The Warren & District Residents Association has worked with Festival Republic to organise the clear-up. All money raised will go to the regeneration of the Pavilion for the benefit of the whole community.
Do put this Sunday 1st September in your diary and find yourself real bargains.
Mapledurham Pavilion is on the Upper Woodcote Road (A4074), RG4 7LB
Update: For further information, see today's GetReading (30 August). Here's the link
It is staggering what festival goers leave behind: once used tents, sleeping bags, wellies and other camping paraphernalia.
Thanks to volunteers who are helping clear the site and sort through the equipment you can benefit by getting excellent quality goods at knock-down prices.
The Warren & District Residents Association has worked with Festival Republic to organise the clear-up. All money raised will go to the regeneration of the Pavilion for the benefit of the whole community.
Do put this Sunday 1st September in your diary and find yourself real bargains.
Mapledurham Pavilion is on the Upper Woodcote Road (A4074), RG4 7LB
Update: For further information, see today's GetReading (30 August). Here's the link
Sunday, 21 July 2013
Much Needed Resurfacing Work Across Reading
The
programme of road resurfacing is due to start tomorrow, Monday 22nd July, and will last for 7 weeks
(weather permitting). The programme should therefore be completed on Friday 6th August.
The
resurfacing works will be carried out by Eurovia Infrastructure Limited, on
behalf of Reading Borough Council, and have been timed to coincide with the
school summer holidays. Advance warning notices will be erected on site and
letters delivered to affected properties.
The
areas we are intending to resurface and expected durations are as follows:
Rotherfield
Way/Southdown Road – Hemdean Road
to Evesham Road
(Peppard / Thames Wards) – Monday 22 July, expected to
last 3 days. Working hours 8am to 8pm. Full road closure required with a signed
diversion route in operation.
Prospect Street – Henley Road to Church Street
(Caversham / Thames Wards) – Thursday 25 July, expected to last 2
days. Working hours 9.30am to 3.30pm. Full road closure required with a signed
diversion route in operation.
Bridge Street, Caversham – Richfield Avenue to
Church Road
(Abbey / Caversham Wards) – Saturday 10 August, expected
to last 2 days. Working hours 8am to 8pm. Full road closure required with a
signed diversion route will be in operation.
The Forbury – Sections from
Market Place to Valpy Street
(Abbey Ward) – Saturday 17 and Sunday 18
August. Working hours 8am to 8pm. Full road closure required with a signed
diversion route in operation for the duration.
NB: All programmed
dates are subject to change depending on weather conditions.
Wednesday, 17 July 2013
Thursday, 4 July 2013
Education & Excellence
Many parents in Reading have had a poor lot for far too long
as far as education for their children is concerned. An historic lack of
strategic planning by the Labour-led Borough Council and a resulting shortage
of places at the best schools has led to widespread parental dissatisfaction
and many children forced to attend schools out of Reading .
Over a decade ago, on offer day, I remember how
shocked I was not to be offered a place at either of my two local in-catchment
primary schools for my son. Both schools had good reputations, so my
husband and I didn’t mind which we were offered, but to have no place
whatsoever was alarming and unsettling.
After several anxious weeks, eventually our son was
offered a place at our nearest local primary. Naively we thought our
school admissions problems were over. However, after he started school
the catchment areas were changed by the Council, so our younger child was
unlikely to be able to go to her brother’s primary, even though we hadn’t moved
house!
Another parent and I then researched the town’s
birth rate and proved the local schools north of the river were likely to
continue to be oversubscribed every year. We campaigned for siblings like
my daughter to have protection and after some months, we were successful.
The Labour administration was forced to concede and correct this blatantly
unfair admission rule.
My children in 2001 |
Generally however, even back in 2001 there was an
annual problem of families in parts of the town failing to get places at their
catchment school because of the Labour administration’s failure to deal with
the evident lack of places. It was also an era when too many Reading schools were
failing to provide the quality of education expected by parents across the
town.
My experience highlighted to me the importance of
providing sufficient school places for children to be able to be with their
older siblings in the same primary as each other, and of course for all schools
to be offering a good standard of education. I became a Conservative
Councillor because I was determined to do what I could to make this become a
reality in Reading .
It was the Conservatives on Reading Borough Council
who supported my campaign back in 2001 and it is a Conservative-led Government
which is now leading the way in allowing for more school places and for school
improvement. Where the Labour Council has failed to improve Reading ’s schools and
failed to build the new schools necessary to meet the demand, the Government’s
reforms mean motivated and engaged parent groups, backed in some cases by
specialist education providers, can address the shortfall. This
Government’s transformation of the education system is enabling the conversion
of poorly-rated primaries into new academy primaries, the expansion of high
performing existing schools and, where there is the demand, the opening of new
free schools.
I believe a good education, which supports each
child to reach their full potential and prepares them for adulthood, in a
setting that best suits their individual needs, is what the vast majority of
parents want and expect.
From September 2013 teenagers will have the
opportunity of going to the new East Reading University Technical College (UTC)
where expertise from its IT and engineering sponsors will provide an
up-to-the-minute education to complement the national curriculum. Rob
Wilson MP led the way in getting this exciting new type of school for Reading which elsewhere
has engaged and energised students which the regular secondary system often
fails to engage.
Also in September 2013 a new Free
School for pupils with autism will
open, filling a gap between main stream and special schools which will
complement the Ofsted-rated “Outstanding” Avenue School
Academy on the adjacent
site.
In September 2014 the West Reading Education
Network (WREN) Group is set to open a new secondary school in West Reading,
with The Heights Group set to open a new primary school serving Caversham Heights . Both are Free Schools
which would not have been opened under any other Government; they will provide
much needed capacity and are supported by a ground swell of parental and
community support as well as their respective Conservative Members of
Parliament.
Only the Conservatives have a track record of
enabling parents to deliver choice and excellence in education. If you share
our aspiration for a better education for all of our children in a school that
suits their needs please join us in campaigning for more free schools and
academies, free from the dead hand of Reading Labour Party’s control.
Tuesday, 2 July 2013
Conservatives condemn Labour's decision to close Arthur Clark Care Home
Arthur Clark Residential Care Home |
Conservatives turned out in force for last night’s first ever meeting of the Adult Social Care, Children’s Services, and Education Committee in support of campaigners who packed the public gallery. As well as Sandra Vickers (Tilehurst), James Anderson (Kentwood) and me who sit on the committee, Cllrs Tim Harris (Church), Jeanette Skeats (Thames), David Stevens (Thames), Ed Hopper (Thames) and Richard Willis (Peppard) sat in the public gallery behind them with Reading East MP Rob Wilson. Cllr Hopper and Rob Wilson addressed the meeting as members of the public after passionate speeches from campaigner Colin Trinder and Rev Marion Pyke.
It was notable that neither Cllr Richard Davies (Caversham-Labour), or Labour’s Reading East Parliamentary Candidate spoke or even bothered to attend the meeting.
After over an hour and a half of questions, speeches and debate Labour’s Lead Councillor circulated a pre-prepared amended motion which made it clear that the decision to close both the Arthur Clark home and Albert Road Day Centre had already effectively been taken. I picked this up and pointed out that since the motion had been printed prior to the meeting the whole debate had been a waste of time as the Labour Group had already decided to close the two facilities.
Cllr Sandra Vickers spoke about how her own mother had visited Arthur Clark and told how she loved the home and the quality of care provided. Cllr James Anderson urged the Labour administration to consider this a matter for their hearts rather than their heads.
However, at the end of the debate, the Labour Councillors on the Committee voted for the motion to close Arthur Clark Home and Albert Road Day Centre. All other Councillors (apart from the Chairman who abstained) voted against the closure motion.
Cllr Ed Hopper said, “I am hugely disappointed by the decision to close the Arthur Clark Care Home which has been taken by Reading Borough Council’s Labour Administration tonight.
Over 3,600 people plus every Conservative Councillor, our MP Rob Wilson and all other opposition Councillors have all expressed their adamant opposition to this closure.
The consultation which RBC has undertaken is not worthy of the name, having ignored genuine opportunities to work with local residents and businesses to seek ways to keep this valuable Home open.”
Cllr Tim Harris said, “Once again the Labour Group has ignored the wishes of the thousands of local people who signed the petition and those who took time out to attend a second Council meeting to discuss the proposed closure. We asked the Labour administration to consider all options including discussions with possible private care providers but they chose to ignore this and the pleas from the public gallery.”
I said, “Labour is quite prepared to spend around £60m on providing new Civic Offices but they refuse to find less than £1m to undertake the maintenance backlog which has been identified at Arthur Clark home. Tonight’s meeting was a waste of time as Labour had already made their decision before the meeting even started. The consultation was a sham, just as the promised consultation on using the site for ‘extra-care’ housing for the elderly will probably prove to be.”
Speaking after the meeting Conservative Councillors and Rob Wilson MP pledged to help the residents in any way possible to keep up the fight for the future of Arthur Clark home and Albert Road Day Centre.
Labels:
Democracy,
Mapledurham Ward,
Social Care,
Thames Ward
Friday, 28 June 2013
D-Day for Arthur Clark Care Home
Conservatives
at the Reading Borough Council meeting on Tuesday stood alongside local
residents to call for the Labour administration to scrap plans to close the
Arthur Clark care home in Albert Road, Caversham. Residents protested outside
the Council chamber before the meeting and packed the meeting to present a
petition and ask questions of the Labour Lead Councillor.
Cllr Ed Hopper with protestors before Council |
Due to
the large number of signatures on the petition a debate was generated at the
start of the Council meeting. The Labour administration moved a weasel worded
motion referring the concerns of the petitioners to the Council’s new Adult
Social Care, Childrens’ Services and Education Committee which meets on Monday 1st
July.
Thames
Ward Councillors Ed Hopper and David Stevens then moved and seconded an
amendment which called on the administration to “cease all attempts to close
Arthur Clark care home”. This was supported by all Councillors except for the
Labour administration. Even the single Caversham Labour Councillor and Labour’s
Reading East Parliamentary candidate voted against the amendment!
After
lengthy debate, Labour voted down the Conservative amendment and used their
majority to push through their motion.
Cllr Ed Hopper
said, “I wanted to give the Council as a
whole an opportunity to say that the Arthur Clark home should remain open
rather than see the decision pushed off to a committee of which only a few
Councillors are members. I was pleased that so many Councillors supported my
amendment but disappointed that Labour used their majority to override the
views of others Councillors and the large number of residents in the gallery”.
Cllr David Stevens said, “This is the first time
ever that the public has presented a petition with enough signatures to trigger
a debate. I am amazed therefore that the Labour Group was not willing to listen
to the strength of feeling locally and invest in this care home rather than
just close it down. We will keep up the fight to ensure that the views of local
people are heard and heeded.”
At the end of the evening after the presentation of
the petition, exhaustive debate, and numerous questions Cllr Ralph
(Independent) moved a motion which many had expected him to withdraw. It was
rather after the fact, as the Labour administration had made their position
clear in the earlier debate, but in the spirit of cooperation Conservative
Councillors had decided to support Cllr Ralph’s motion and voted against
Labour’s inevitable amendment. In the most bizarre moment of the night Cllr
Ralph then voted in favour of Labour’s amendment and against his own motion!
You can watch the council meeting online on YouTube and see for yourself 'democracy' in action.
D-Day for the Arthur Clark care home is Monday, 1st July at 6.30 pm. Members of the public are encouraged to attend and, if they give advance notification of their intention to film proceedings are permitted to do so.
Update You can read GetReading's report in today's paper here. If you have a view on the future of the Arthur Clark residential care home why don't you post a comment?
Update You can read GetReading's report in today's paper here. If you have a view on the future of the Arthur Clark residential care home why don't you post a comment?
Labels:
Health,
Mapledurham Ward,
Social Care,
Thames Ward
Tuesday, 18 June 2013
Public Meeting: Bus Update for North of the River Wednesday 19th June
My Conservative colleague and
Peppard Ward councillor, Richard Willis, has organised a public meeting
tomorrow night at 6.45 pm at the Milestone Centre, Northbrook Road , Caversham Park
Village , about the bus
services and the changes which will come once the new northern inter-change to
Reading Station opens.
The CEO of Reading Buses, James
Freeman, will explain the proposed changes after which he has kindly agreed to
take questions from the floor.
Richard has also arranged for a
senior Council Transport Officer to attend to speak on the planned new
pedestrian/cycle bridge over the Thames . This
bridge was something which he proposed when he was Lead Councillor and we began
the work to include it in a bid to central Government for the funding. The bid
was successful and will now be built in the next year or so.
All north of the river residents are
welcome to attend the meeting but if they cannot I am happy to arrange for a
summary of the briefing to be emailed to them following the meeting.
Thursday, 13 June 2013
A Lot Going On
I apologise for not posting as regularly as I used to. About 3 months ago I started working full time for Rob Wilson MP in his constituency office which has reduced my available time for this. Fortunately though I am able to continue both my councillor role as well as the chairman of governors at The Avenue Special School.
Officers & councillors outside the Pavilion |
For many years I've been on Reading Borough Council's Planning Committee and this morning, for about 1.5 hours, I joined other committee members on our monthly site visits. Mapledurham Pavilion was our second stop. One reason I'd asked for the visit was to show Labour councillors its dilapidated state. They were visibly shocked. I think two out of the three hadn't seen it before. I showed them most of the inside as well whilst "Escape" (the parent & toddler group I used to run) started up its session. But for the toddlers & mums, the hall would have been bleak too.
This reminds me that a week on Saturday, 22nd June, is the second Mapledurham Fete. It starts at noon, carrying on all afternoon and metamorphosing into a music festival in the evening. As last year, all monies raised will go towards regenerating the Pavilion, which could happen soon if the planning application goes through unhindered. I'll be running a skittles stall again and hope lots of people will come and enjoy what I'm sure will be a great day supporting this excellent cause.
Getting back to this morning's visit, outside the Pavilion was a hive of activity with a multi-agency crack down led by the Police of various motoring offences. They were: pulling over motorists for using a mobile phone, driving without a safety belt, speeding; checking for the illegal use of red diesel, ensuring anyone transporting metal had a licence, checking tyres, etc. Also present were Council officers, independent observers & Neighbourhood Watch Group (NAG) members. I don't yet know the stats, but was pleased to see such a big operation in action. Sergeant Nigel Scarratt & PCSO Ian Chaston were there together with Police from further afield.
Wednesday, 22 May 2013
'The Heights' Free School gets the Go Ahead!
The Heights |
The school will serve the local area in the west of Caversham including all of Mapledurham Ward, Caversham Heights, for which I am the local councillor.
At last families in my Ward will have a realistic chance of getting a local primary school place. Every year parents are disappointed because they are unable to get their child into their designated local school. They have been forced into their cars to drive their children to schools on the other side of Caversham or even out of the Reading Borough.
I'm especially pleased for Ruth, Polly, Susan and the other parents who have worked so hard on the bid to get to this point. Their dedication and commitment is inspirational and I look forward to helping them get the school up and running for next September.
My colleague Cllr Tim Harris, Leader of the Conservative Group said, "This is fabulous news and I congratulate the parents involved who have been supported throughout by Cllr Isobel Ballsdon and Reading East MP Rob Wilson. They have embraced the opportunity provided by the Conservative-led Government's reforms and galvanised local support for their Free School bid. They have achieved what the Labour Council over the last decade has failed to deliver: a new school for Caversham."
When more details are known I will post again, though do also check The Heights' website too!
Update: The WREN bid for a new secondary Free School to serve West Reading has also been successful! For further information check their website: Wren School
Further Update: You can watch ITV coverage of The Heights parent group, parents from the WREN group and others in an article filmed yesterday (22 May) after the announcement by following this link
Tuesday, 30 April 2013
Labour's new line up
Three are out: Marian Livingstone, Mike Orton and Bet
Tickner
The three new are: Richard Davies, Graham Hoskin and Liz
Terry
Everybody, except Jo Lovelock, is having some change to the
scope of their role
Community Involvement
& Service Improvement has been ditched.
Perhaps the disgraceful prioritisation of IT equipment for councillors
over decent IT equipment for the social worker team has something to do with
this decision: Or maybe the Labour administration has realised (belatedly) that
their “justification” was baseless rubbish.
Graham Hoskin is back on the front bench having served out his
punishment for his unsuccessful leadership bid a couple of years ago. Having had Culture & Sport before, now he has been handed Health.
Tony Jones will be Deputy Mayor again (previously having had
the role in 2000), whilst his wife Liz Terry, who was elected just a year ago
and hasn’t risen much in Council to speak in that time, is to cover Neighbourhoods. Previously this had gone together with Housing but Labour has decided to split
the two giving Housing to another
2012 intake, Richard Davies.
John Ennis’ role is being reduced to solely Education with Jan Gavin taking on Children’s Services & Families.
Rachel Eden has been moved to Adult Social Care replacing Mike Orton who, though his shoes are big
ones to fill, his recent attendance record has not been great.
With Marian Livingstone stepping into the role as Mayor [I’m
against Labour’s flouting of the traditional year as deputy before stepping up to
the role of Mayor] her current lead role of Culture
& Sport is being given as part of Paul Gittings’ new role of Culture & Sport & Consumer Services. Interesting to note Labour has dropped Climate Change!
Tony Page remains as deputy leader, whilst his lead role
will also cover the Environment, so
will be Strategic Planning, Environment
& Transport
In summary Labour's new roles & line up are as follows:
Leader of the Council (chair) Jo Lovelock
Adult Social Care Rachel
Eden
Children’s Services & Families Jan GavinCulture & Sport & Consumer Services Paul Gittings
Education John Ennis
Health Graham Hoskin
Housing Richard Davies
Neighbourhoods Liz Terry
Strategic Planning, Environment & Transport Tony Page
Mayor of Reading Marian
Livingstone
Deputy Mayor Tony
Jones
Wednesday, 3 April 2013
Welfare State's Part in Philpott's Heinous Crime
In Guido's excellent post, to which the following tweet refers, there is a must read comment which I copy below:
If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this…
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay £1.
The sixth would pay £3.
The seventh would pay £7..
The eighth would pay £12.
The ninth would pay £18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay £59.
So, that’s what they decided to do..
The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve ball.
“Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by £20″. Drinks for the ten men would now cost just £80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes.
So the first four men were unaffected.
They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men?
The paying customers?
How could they divide the £20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?
They realised that £20 divided by six is £3.33. But if they
subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.
So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by a higher percentage the poorer he was, to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using, and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.
And so the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% saving).
The sixth now paid £2 instead of £3 (33% saving).
The seventh now paid £5 instead of £7 (28% saving).
The eighth now paid £9 instead of £12 (25% saving).
The ninth now paid £14 instead of £18 (22% saving).
The tenth now paid £49 instead of £59 (16% saving).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings.
“I only got a pound out of the £20 saving,” declared the sixth man.
He pointed to the tenth man,”but he got £10!”
“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a pound too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!”
“That’s true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get £10 back, when I got only £2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”
“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn’t get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!”
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and government ministers, is how our tax system works.
The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction.
Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore.
In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.
Professor of Economics.
For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible
Re-posted from Pete Ross
Guido Fawkes (@GuidoFawkes) | |
Welfare State Was Evil Philpott’s Accomplice guyfawk.es/13Qri0y
|
Stuart says:
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to £100…If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this…
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay £1.
The sixth would pay £3.
The seventh would pay £7..
The eighth would pay £12.
The ninth would pay £18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay £59.
So, that’s what they decided to do..
The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve ball.
“Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by £20″. Drinks for the ten men would now cost just £80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes.
So the first four men were unaffected.
They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men?
The paying customers?
How could they divide the £20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share?
They realised that £20 divided by six is £3.33. But if they
subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.
So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by a higher percentage the poorer he was, to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using, and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay.
And so the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% saving).
The sixth now paid £2 instead of £3 (33% saving).
The seventh now paid £5 instead of £7 (28% saving).
The eighth now paid £9 instead of £12 (25% saving).
The ninth now paid £14 instead of £18 (22% saving).
The tenth now paid £49 instead of £59 (16% saving).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings.
“I only got a pound out of the £20 saving,” declared the sixth man.
He pointed to the tenth man,”but he got £10!”
“Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a pound too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!”
“That’s true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get £10 back, when I got only £2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”
“Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn’t get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!”
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and government ministers, is how our tax system works.
The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction.
Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore.
In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.
Professor of Economics.
For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible
Re-posted from Pete Ross
A Spurious Argument by Labour
Reading’s Labour administration is stopping the automatic
forwarding of emails from the council email account of each councillor to their
personal email account. They are justifying this on the shaky grounds that this
puts Reading Council at risk of fines by the Information Commissioner’s Office
(ICO).
During February’s full council meeting Labour’s Lead for
Service Improvement Cllr Jan Gavin produced a list of ICO fines to the
Conservative Group which she claimed proved that local authorities were being
fined for insecure councillor emails.
However when I worked through Cllr Gavin’s list looking
carefully at each example not one supported her claim! Some had nothing whatsoever to do with local
authorities. However those cases
relating to authorities substantiated my argument: that the highly confidential
papers dealt with by the social worker teams must be protected.
The London Borough of Lewisham was on Labour’s list. Lewisham was fined £70,000 as a result of a
social worker leaving highly confidential documents on a train in a carrier
bag. If only that social worker had
instead held the sensitive information in a secure council net-book computer
nobody could have easily read the information.
As the public knows, social workers have a crucial
front-line role protecting our town’s most vulnerable children. They deal with highly confidential
information and the pressure on them to keep looked after children safe is
colossal. It is absolutely essential
they have secure, up-to-date mobiles and a net-book computer to minimise the
risk of information getting mislaid.
In contrast councillors’ emails are nowhere near as
confidential. The majority of emails contain
information publically available.
Confidential papers are not generally sent by email; they are couriered to
each councillor. Any emails of a
confidential nature omit names, referring instead to initials, for example to
“Mrs B” to prevent identification.
Reading’s Labour Group has failed to come up with a single
example of an authority being fined because of a councillor’s email going
astray.
During 26th March council meeting, my colleague Cllr Andrew Cumpsty
asked the Leader of the Council if she could confirm what percentage of IT kit was
recycled. Cllr Lovelock admitted that
only 30% of laptops and netbooks were pre-used equipment. This was interesting as at February’s meeting
she had stated that the equipment was mostly (70%) recycled!
Instead of an apology for having misled Council, Labour’s
Leader attacked Cllr Cumpsty for “putting
his own convenience above the need to protect sensitive data.” She continued that “this has gone on for long enough and he needs to understand that there
has to be a date by which any insecure method of sending e-mails to Councillors
will be stopped – quite simply Cllr Cumpsty will very soon be unable to access
Council e-mails unless he takes up one of the solutions on offer. He will be cut off by his own stubborn
adherence to his own convenience. I
would advise him to think about how to avoid that.”
Labour’s vicious attack on an opposition councillor is
nothing new. When their group loses an
argument they regularly resort to this tactic.
Whenever members of the public witness such behaviour they are shocked
to the core.
We opposition councillors nurse our “wounds” consoling
ourselves that these are evidence of voicing the winning argument against
Labour. However the lack of respect and dignity the
Labour Group shows to opposition councillors is detrimental to democratic
debate and hinders the service to Reading’s residents for which we were all
elected.
I struggle to understand why Labour prioritise the provision
of IT equipment for councillors over giving social workers up-to-date IT
equipment. The £10,653 expenditure on IT equipment for councillors would have
been much better spent on IT equipment for social workers, or even towards
mending some of Reading’s pothole ridden roads.
Delaying councillors accessing emails by stopping automatic
forwarding will obviously impede our ability to help residents quickly and
efficiently.
It will all be down to Labour’s phoney argument.
Saturday, 30 March 2013
Update on state of The Warren
Further to my post on Monday, I've heard back from RBC's Highways Department about the problem area of The Warren.
A letter drop, press release and signs warning of imminent works, together with arranging a Temporary Traffic Regulation Order will be carried out by RBC next week.
Details are to be agreed and finalised after a local consultation which will be carried out by the Highways Department.
In the meantime RBC has increased the number of cones and warning signs to keep vehicles and other road users away from the failed area.
A letter drop, press release and signs warning of imminent works, together with arranging a Temporary Traffic Regulation Order will be carried out by RBC next week.
Details are to be agreed and finalised after a local consultation which will be carried out by the Highways Department.
In the meantime RBC has increased the number of cones and warning signs to keep vehicles and other road users away from the failed area.
Tuesday, 26 March 2013
Positive Change at Priory Avenue Surgery
Priory Avenue Surgery |
There will be no change in service initially but as from July longer opening hours, from 8 am to 8 pm will be introduced with GP services available seven days a week. For the first time surgery patients will benefit from being able to book an appointment online and have the opportunity to be reminded of their appointment by text if they wish. This is excellent news as it will simplify and speedup what often can be a tedious process, restricted by the surgery's current opening hours.
I welcome the announcements and look forward to meeting the new GPs when next I or my family need an appointment.
Monday, 25 March 2013
Suspected Subsidence Highlighted by Pothole
Pothole in conned off part of The Warren |
Reading Borough Council (RBC) officers were quick to respond to my phone call and follow-up email, sending out an officer to put cones along the road to warn drivers, runners and other road users. I met the officer at about 5.30 pm whilst I was taking a look at the problem for myself.
Peter Brett Associates, who are consultant engineers to RBC, will be sending out engineers tomorrow morning to assess the situation.
I am always happy to take up concerns of residents and help get appropriate, timely action so do let me know if you spot something RBC should sort out.
Tuesday, 12 March 2013
Foster Carers & Armed Forces Excluded from Housing Benefits Reform
Further to my previous post on the under occupancy reforms to Housing Benefits (the so called "bedroom tax") the following statement has been made today by the Secretary of State for Work & Pensions Iain Duncan Smith MP setting out further protection for foster carer families and armed forces personnel living in social housing:
Written Ministerial Statement
Tuesday 12 March 2013
THE DEPARTMENT FOR WORK AND PENSIONS
Housing Benefit reform
The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Rt. Hon. Iain Duncan Smith MP): I am pleased to announce that we intend to lay amending regulations to clarify the size criteria rules for two specific groups of Housing Benefit recipient, Foster Carers and Armed Forces personnel.
People who are approved foster carers will be allowed an additional room, whether or not a child has been placed with them or they are between placements, so long as they have fostered a child, or become an approved foster carer in the last 12 months.
Adult children who are in the Armed Forces but who continue to live with parents will be treated as continuing to live at home, even when deployed on operations. This means that the size criteria rules will not be applied to the room normally occupied by the member of the Armed Forces if they intend to return home. In addition Housing Benefit recipients will not be subject to a non-dependent deduction, i.e. the amount
that those who are working are expected to contribute to the household expenses, until an adult child return home.
The intent of the policy was that by using Discretionary Housing Payments, the estimated 5,000 foster carers and rather fewer Armed Forces personnel groups would be protected. We have agreed with local authority organisations improved arrangements through these regulations that puts these protections beyond doubt.
The changes will apply to tenants in both the social and private rented sectors.
I am also issuing guidance to local authorities emphasising that Discretionary Housing Payments remain available for other priority groups including the needs of people whose homes have had significant disability adaptations and those with long term medical conditions that create difficulties in sharing a bedroom.
Going forward I will continue to closely monitor and adjust the implementation of the policy, including an independent evaluation by Ipsos MORI, the Cambridge Centre for Housing and Planning Research and the Institute For Fiscal Studies to ensure that the needs of these groups are effectively addressed in the longer term.
This ensures this policy focuses on the key aim of bringing housing benefit expenditure under control. Under the previous Government, housing benefit almost doubled in 10 years to £20billion, with households living in homes that are too big for them, whilst there are 2 million households in England on waiting lists, and 250,000 families living in over-crowded accommodation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)